Societies for Pediatric Urology

SPU Home SPU Home Past & Future Meetings Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2026 Abstracts


Socioeconomic Status Does Not Predict Catheterization Adherence in Children Requiring CIC: Reassuring Evidence from a Universal-Access Healthcare System
Julie Wong, MD1, Samer Maher, BSc2, Abby Varghese, NP1, Noreen Goraya, MSW1, Armando Lorenzo, MD1, Joana Dos Santos, MD1, Michael Chua, MD1, Mandy Rickard, NP1
1Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

BACKGROUND: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is an essential part of managing patients with neurogenic bladder (NGB) and posterior urethral valves (PUV). Concerns remain that families with lower socioeconomic status (SES) may face greater barriers to adherence, particularly in insurance-based healthcare settings. In our single-payer, publicly funded system, we sought to determine whether SES influences CIC adherence among children followed in our urology clinic.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients prescribed CIC for PUV (2000-2025) or NGB (those undergoing intravesical Botox). Adherence was defined as performing ≥80% of prescribed catheterizations across all clinic visits (self-reported). SES was evaluated using postal-code-linked indices: the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-Marg) and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD). Additional SES factors were abstracted from chart review. Associations among SES indicators, CIC adherence, and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) were assessed using Fisher's exact, and t-tests as appropriate.
RESULTS: 209 children were prescribed CIC; 59 (28.2%) were non-adherent. 66 (31.6%) experienced recurrent UTIs. Residence in the highest-marginalization quintile of any ON-Marg or CIMD domain was not associated with CIC non-adherence. Similarly, SES measures did not predict recurrent UTIs, and CIC adherence was not associated with differential UTI outcomes (Tables 1-2). However, single-parent household status was significantly associated with CIC non-adherence (Table 3).
CONCLUSIONS: In a universal-access healthcare system, socioeconomic marginalization was not associated with poor CIC adherence among children. These findings are reassuring and suggest that equitable access to supplies, multidisciplinary follow-up, and publicly funded care may mitigate SES-related disparities observed elsewhere. Future work should explore individualized, non-SES-related barriers to adherence to further optimize outcomes for this population.

Table 1: Patient Characteristics
CategorySubcategoryNumber (percentage)
DiseaseNeurogenic bladder116 (55.5%)
Posterior urethral valves93 (44.5%)
CIC adherenceAdherent150 (71.8%)
Non-adherent59 (28.2%)
Recurrent UTINo137 (65.6%)
Yes66 (31.6%)
Single-parent householdNo176 (84.2%)
Yes27 (12.9%)
Missing6 (2.9%)
Difficulty paying for basic needsNo37 (17.7%)
Yes30 (14.4%)
Missing142 (67.9%)
Primary care accessNo8 (3.8%)
Yes199 (95.2%)
Missing2 (1.0%)

Table 2: CIC adherence and recurrent UTI contingency table
No recurrent UTI, n (%)Recurrent UTI, n (%)Total
Non-adherent36 (63.2%)21 (36.8%)57p-value = 0.4106
Adherent101 (69.2%)45 (30.8%)146
Total13766203

Table 3: CIC and socioeconomic variables
VariableTotal n usedStatistical testp-value
English as primary language209Chi-square0.853
Difficulty paying for basic needs67Chi-square0.433
Household income (ordinal)64Fisher's exact0.976
Parent education (ordinal)47Fisher's exact0.321
Single-parent household203Chi-square0.016
Primary care access207Fisher's exact0.228


Back to 2026 Abstracts